Specific Identification
π― Learning Objectives
- Understand when specific identification is appropriate vs. cost flow assumptions
- Calculate COGS and ending inventory using actual specific costs
- Identify industries and products suitable for specific identification
- Compare specific identification to FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average methods
- Apply specific identification to unique inventory items
π Background & Principles
Specific Identification is an inventory costing method where each item's actual cost is tracked and matched with revenue when that specific item is sold. Unlike FIFO, LIFO, or weighted average (which are cost flow assumptions), specific identification matches actual costs to actual items.
This method provides the most accurate matching of costs to revenue but requires extensive tracking and is practical only for items that can be individually identified.
π Key Concepts
Inventory costing method tracking actual cost of each individual item, matching exact cost to revenue when sold.
Each inventory item has a unique identifier (serial number, VIN, lot number) linking to its specific cost.
When an item sells, its exact purchase cost is recorded as COGSβno averaging or assumptions.
Unique, high-value items where tracking costs is justified: jewelry, art, automobiles, real estate.
Companies can select which specific items to sell, potentially affecting reported income.
Specific identification is an alternative to FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average when items are not homogeneous.
π Deep Dive
Explore Specific Identification at different levels of depth:
π’ Foundational Level
Understanding the "Diamond Ring" analogy.
The Jewelry Store Example
Analogy: Unique Diamonds
Two diamond rings look similar to customers, but they have different specs:
You CANNOT average these to $7,500. When Ring A sells for $8,000, COGS is exactly $5,000 (not average).
π‘ Standard Level
Calculation and application examples.
Automobile Dealership Example
Given Inventory:
Car #1 (VIN-001): $25,000 cost, $32,000 selling price
Car #2 (VIN-002): $28,000 cost, $35,000 selling price
Car #3 (VIN-003): $22,000 cost, $30,000 selling price
COGS = $25,000 + $22,000 = $47,000
Ending Inventory = Car #2 at $28,000
COGS = $25,000 + $28,000 = $53,000
Ending Inventory = Car #3 at $22,000
Different ending inventory values depending on WHICH specific cars were sold! This gives companies some discretion over income.
π΄ Advanced Level
Method comparison and ethical considerations.
Comparing All Four Methods
Same Inventory: 10 units @ $10, 20 units @ $12, 15 units @ $15, 12 units ending
| Method | Ending Inventory | COGS |
|---|---|---|
| FIFO (newest costs) | $180 | $385 |
| LIFO (oldest costs) | $124 | $441 |
| Weighted Average | $150.72 | $414.28 |
| Specific ID (varies) | Varies | Varies |
β Advantages
- Most accurate cost matching
- Reflects actual inventory flow
- Ideal for unique, high-value items
- Gives precise financial information
β οΈ Disadvantages
- Complex and expensive to implement
- Requires tracking each item
- Potential for income manipulation
- Not practical for homogeneous goods
π’ Industries Using Specific Identification
Specific identification is practical when items are unique and tracking costs is justified.
π« Common Misconceptions & Professional Tips
β Reality: Specific identification is more accurate for UNIQUE items. For homogeneous goods (wheat, oil, identical electronics), cost flow assumptions like FIFO are actually MORE practical and appropriate.
β Reality: Companies using specific identification can CHOOSE which identical-looking items to sell. This allows manipulation of COGS and income within the constraints of what's available.
β Reality: Specific identification is only practical and appropriate when items are unique and can be individually tracked. For mass-market identical products, it's impractical and unnecessary.
π§ Memory Aids & Quick Reference
Each item = Its actual cost
When sold β That specific cost goes to COGS
When remains β That specific cost stays in inventory
Best for: Unique, high-value, trackable items
Each item has different cost. Track individually by serial number or ID.
Actual cost matches actual item sold. No averaging or assumptions.
Companies can select which items to sell, affecting income.
Extensive tracking required. Only justified for high-value items.
π Glossary
Inventory costing method tracking actual cost of each individual item and matching that exact cost to revenue when sold.
Assigning unique identifiers to each inventory item for tracking its specific cost through the system.
Unique identifier for automobiles linking to specific options, features, and acquisition cost.
Identical or interchangeable inventory items where specific tracking is impractical. Better suited for weighted average.
Method for assigning costs to COGS when specific items cannot be traced. FIFO, LIFO, and weighted average are cost flow assumptions.
Risk in specific identification where companies can select which specific items to sell to affect reported income.
Grouping inventory by production batch or purchase lot, each with specific cost. Middle ground between individual and average tracking.
Another name for specific identification, emphasizing that actual costs (not assumed or averaged) are used.
π― Final Knowledge Check
Test your understanding of Specific Identification:
Question 1: Specific identification is most appropriate for:
Question 2: When Car A ($25,000) and Car B ($28,000) are sold, COGS equals:
Question 3: A key disadvantage of specific identification is:
Question 4: A dealership tracking each car by VIN is using:
Question 5: For which product would specific identification be impractical?